Resources & Utilities Asia July 2025
Emerging
Benchmark status
We consider this an emerging benchmark: it has enough data available for us to use bootstrapping to create a representative sample. As the sample grows in size, some scores may slightly change. Our research has shown that our bootstrapped scores are consistent with our standard benchmarks. Read more about the methodology.
Data provided by Culture Amp
Most represented industries in this benchmark
Oil & Energy, Utilities, Renewables & Environment, Environmental Services, Mining & Metals
Reported gender breakdown
Male
71%
Female
29%
Non-Binary
0.03%
Are employees committed to their organizations?
Engaged people are emotionally committed to their organization. These people stay at their organizations longer and are more productive and effective. Successful organizations have more engaged employees.
77% of Resources and Utilities Asia employees are engaged
This is in the top 31% compared with the overall average.
The median eNPS score for organizations in this benchmark is 28 and is in the top 10% compared with the overall average.
How does Resources and Utilities Asia compare?
People in Resources & Utilities Asia were much more positive than average regarding Feedback & Recognition, Action, and Collaboration & Communication.
People working in Resources & Utilities Asia are more engaged than Nonprofit Organization Management Europe, Hungary, Germany (200-500), and Turkey 1000+. People working in Resources & Utilities Asia are less engaged than Colombia, Engaging Growth, Computer Software Philippines, and Tech: Manufacturing & Research East Asia.
The highest scoring question for Resources & Utilities Asia had 92% of people agreeing that they know how their work contributes to the goals of %[Company]% (+3% compared to overall) while they were generally most positive about Inclusion.
People in Resources & Utilities Asia were generally least favourable about Feedback & Recognition, and were most negative towards 'I believe my total compensation (base salary+any bonuses+benefits+equity) is fair, relative to similar roles at other companies' with 21% of people disagreeing (-2% below average).
How long do people stay?
In the short term, 12% of people in this benchmark are thinking of or actually seeking jobs elsewhere (-8% compared to overall) while on a longer time frame, 6% of people see themselves leaving within two years (-4% compared to overall).
Understanding Tenure distributions
Tenure describes how long an employee has worked for their company: we know through our research that newly hired employees tend to be more positive than their tenured counterparts. Positivity declines sharply before bottoming out between two to six years, then rises slightly for those that remain.
The tenure composition of a benchmark can influence overall scores.
Tenure distributions
Less than 3 months
1%
3 months to 6 months
3%
6 months to less than 1 year
7%
1 to less than 2 years
18%
2 to less than 4 years
28%
4 to less than 6 years
10%
6 to less than 10 years
15%
Greater than 10 years
18%